MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416824463 · doi:10.1093/plankt/fbaf062

Sedimentary evidence of invasive cladoceran <i>Bosmina (Eubosmina) coregoni</i> presence on the Pacific coast of North America over four decades before first detection

2025· article· en· W4416824463 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Isaac Armstrong, Kathleen R. Laird, Brian F. Cumming

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Plankton Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPaleolimnologyZooplanktonSedimentCladoceraBranchiopodaCrustaceanHydrobiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract While the invasion of Eurasian cladoceran Bosmina (Eubosmina) coregoni to the Laurentian Great Lakes is well-documented, its spread to the west coast of North America is less understood. We provide evidence that Bosmina (Eubosmina) coregoni was present on the Pacific Coast of North America as early as 1965, ~45 years prior to its first observation in this region in 2008. While investigating dated sediment cores in the Kootenay Lake system, British Columbia, Canada, we found B. (E.) coregoni remains in multiple intervals pre-2008, where it was present in high concentrations (up to 1500 exoskeletons/g dry sediment) and a dominant part of the cladoceran assemblage (25–31.5% relative abundance), though it displayed irregular pulses in abundance. While the method of introduction remains unclear, this research reframes the timeline of B. (E.) coregoni introduction and improves our understanding of zooplankton invasion dynamics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.087
Threshold uncertainty score0.174

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Plankton ResearchSame topicAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton DynamicsFrench-language works237,207