MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416830805 · doi:10.5604/01.3001.0055.4633

SOCIAL MINIMUM LEVELS IN POLAND IN THE FIRST QUARTER OF 2025

2025· article· W4416830805 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePolityka Społeczna · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicFinance, Markets, and Regulation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)Index (typography)Value (mathematics)Price indexConsumer price index (South Africa)Energy (signal processing)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<ns3:p>This article presents estimates of the social minimum in the first quarter of 2025. On an annual basis (compared to the first quarter of 2024), modelled household expenditures grew faster than inflation. The social minimum increased from 6.1% in households of parents with one older child to 7.1% in two-person pensioner households, with the consumer price index (CPI) at 4.9%.In contrast, in relation to the previous quarter, the values of the social minimum increased from 1.8% (single work-ing-age person) to 2.0% (households of two pensioners and working households with two or three children), with a slightly lower CPI (1.4%).The increase in the value of the social minimum was largely due to higher valuations in two main groups of needs: food and housing and energy expenses. Food expenditures increased from 2.6% to 2.7%, with a CPI of 2.3%. Model ex-penditures on housing and energy carriers increased from 2.3% to 2.4% with a slightly lower CPI (2.1%). Housing charges in housing communities increased from 2.5% to 2.9%, with a lower CPI (1.2%). Expenditures on energy carriers increased from 1.7% to 2.2%, with a lower CPI (1.5%).</ns3:p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.217
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it