MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416838963 · doi:10.1093/police/paaf053

Police officers’ perceptions of helicopter units: ground-level attitudes toward an eye in the sky

2025· article· en· W4416838963 on OpenAlexafffund
Rylan Simpson

Bibliographic record

VenuePolicing A Journal of Policy and Practice · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolicing Practices and Perceptions
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPerceptionContext (archaeology)SpecialtyUnit (ring theory)Work (physics)Sample (material)Human factors and ergonomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract As an operational specialty unit, helicopter units are used by the police to respond to calls for service, assist ground-level officers, and provide aerial police presence. In light of their mandate, the work of helicopter units in the sky implicates in the work of police officers on the ground. As part of the present research, I queried a sample of police officers (N = 309) from two different police agencies in the USA that employ helicopter units regarding their perceptions of the purpose, utility, deterrence, benefits, and personal impacts of the helicopter unit. I also asked officers to indicate their overall support for the helicopter unit. My analyses revealed that officers perceived the helicopter unit favorably, with some nuance among questions and groups of officers. I discuss my findings in the context of policing research and practice, including with respect to specialty unit dynamics in policing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.605
Threshold uncertainty score0.928

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.138
GPT teacher head0.474
Teacher spread0.336 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePolicing A Journal of Policy and PracticeSame topicPolicing Practices and PerceptionsFrench-language works237,207