Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dramaturge, romancière, nouvelliste, Rolande Falleri est une figure incontournable des Lettres provençales en ce début de vingt-et-unième siècle. Titulaire de la cigale d’argent, Maîtresse en Gai Savoir, secrétaire de la Maintenance de Provence du Félibrige, animatrice de cours de provençal dans le Vaucluse ainsi que de plusieurs réseaux sociaux centrés autour de la langue régionale, Falleri est peut-être encore plus connue pour son engagement dans la défense et la promotion de la langue d’oc. C’est sur ce dernier aspect que se penche Emmanuel Desiles, dans cette étude qui explore successivement le parcours personnel de Falleri, les débuts de sa vocation régionaliste, sa formation linguistique, son adhésion au Félibrige, son action au sein de l’association Parlaren, les spécificités de son parcours de femme dans un mouvement majoritairement dirigé par des hommes, et ses avis quant à une parité plus équilibrée dont elle est l’incarnation. L’article est la synthèse des entretiens que Falleri a accordés à Desiles sur plusieurs mois.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".