MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416846456 · doi:10.21125/iceri.2025.1653

PROMOTING MENTAL HEALTH IN UNIVERSITY SETTINGS: A COMMUNITY-DRIVEN LIVING LAB APPROACH

2025· article· en· W4416846456 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Christiane Bergeron‐Leclerc, Jacques Cherblanc, Sébastien Gaboury, Karine Bilodeau, Sophie Dutil, Marie-Laurence Blackburn

Bibliographic record

VenueICERI proceedings · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMental healthHealth careMental illnessMental health careAgency (philosophy)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted the mental health of university students and employees worldwide. In response to the increased prevalence of anxiety and depressive symptoms observed during this public health crisis, a Living Lab dedicated to promoting mental health within university settings was established in 2021. The main objectives of this Living Lab are to: (a) identify key mental health challenges within Quebec (Canada) university communities; (b) explore actions, initiatives, and resources that support community mental health; (c) implement new mental health promotion initiatives; and (d) evaluate their impact. This presentation, based on a Canadian case study, provides an overview of the Living Lab’s four years of activity, drawing on the results of three research projects conducted during this period. The first section, based on quantitative survey data collected from 2020 to 2022 (n=6000), identifies the main mental health challenges faced by Quebec university students and employees. The second section, grounded in a qualitative study (n=60), highlights the strengths and limitations of mental health support resources available in university environments. The third section focuses on a specific initiative, the ILUMIN Station, a wellness room implemented on our campus. Drawing on both quantitative and qualitative data collected from over 200 participants, this section explores the implementation process and assesses the initiative’s effectiveness. Building on the findings from these three studies, the presentation concludes with reflections and actionable recommendations for promoting mental health across university campuses. This document is a poster.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.109
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0220.011
Scholarly communication0.0100.004
Open science0.0080.021
Research integrity0.0030.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueICERI proceedingsSame topicHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutFrench-language works237,207