MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416851150 · doi:10.1039/d5sc07827j

Supramolecular host–guest modulated thermally activated delayed fluorescence for photodynamic therapy

2025· article· en· W4416851150 on OpenAlexafffund
Xujun Qiu, Peiqi Hu, Angelica Sevilla-Pym, Jana R. Caine, Zachary M. Hudson

Bibliographic record

VenueChemical Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSupramolecular Chemistry and Complexes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersBritish Columbia Knowledge Development FundNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of British ColumbiaKillam TrustsCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsIntersystem crossingSupramolecular chemistryPhotodynamic therapySinglet oxygenFluorescenceQuantum yieldPhotoluminescenceAqueous solution

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Supramolecular host-guest chemistry can tune the photophysical behavior of organic emitters by confining them within well-defined nanoscale environments. Here we report a straightforward strategy to modulate the thermally activated delayed fluorescence (TADF) properties of organic emitters in aqueous media through complexation with the macrocyclic host cucurbit[7]uril (CB[7]). Upon formation of the TADF-CB[7] complex, the photoluminescence quantum yield is enhanced due to the suppression of non-radiative decay pathways within the rigid host cavity. Furthermore, host-guest encapsulation was found to accelerate both forward and reverse intersystem crossing, resulting in improved access to the triplet state. In the presence of molecular oxygen, this facilitates an increased generation of cytotoxic singlet oxygen, thereby boosting the efficacy of photodynamic therapy (PDT). These findings provide a promising supramolecular approach to advancing the application of TADF materials in aqueous-phase PDT systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemical ScienceSame topicSupramolecular Chemistry and ComplexesFrench-language works237,207