Exploiting adversarial style for generalized and robust weed segmentation in rice paddy field
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In precision agriculture, effective weed management is pivotal for enhancing rice cultivation yield and quality. However, accurately differentiating weeds from rice crops remains a fundamental challenge for precision weeding. This study introduces an innovative deep-learning methodology based on style transfer for weed identification and segmentation in paddy fields. We introduce a Style-guided Weed Instance Segmentation (SWIS) method that integrates a Random Adaptive Instance Normalization (RAIN) module for stochastic style transformation and a Dynamic Gradient Back-propagation (DGB) module for adversarial feature optimization. Specifically, the RAIN module aligns feature distributions between laboratory and field environments through stochastic style transformation, enhancing cross-environment generalization. The DGB module employs adversarial optimization with gradient-guided perturbations to enhance feature robustness under complex field conditions. Experimental results demonstrate that our method achieves a Weed Intersection over Union (Weed IoU) of 70.49% on field data, significantly outperforming comparison methods. Therefore, this approach proves effective for real-world applications. Beyond its immediate applications, this research advances computer vision integration in agriculture and establishes a robust foundation for developing more sophisticated, versatile weed recognition models.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".