MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416862881 · doi:10.1186/s13049-025-01518-9

Meeting abstracts of the Toronto Resuscitation Conference

2025· article· en· W4416862881 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueScandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResuscitationCardiopulmonary resuscitationMEDLINEEmergency medical servicesResuscitation Orders

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Managing multiple out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (MOHCA) in a single event provides a unique challenge.These events are poorly described in the research literature, and current triaging systems do not provide guidance when multiple patients on-scene are in cardiac arrest except in specific situations such as avalanches and electrocution.Objective: Describe MOHCA events from a national out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) dataset (Canadian Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium-CanROC).MOHCA events from six Canadian sites between 2018-2022 were identified by a unique event number, time (within five minutes), and location GPS data (within two kilometers).After case ascertainment, calls were reviewed to ensure they were MOCHA events by confirming at least two patients.Descriptive analyses are provided.A total of 87,763 OHCA events yielded 61 MOHCA events and a total of 127 patients.There were two patients in 56 (91.8%) events, and three patients in five (8.2%) events.In 34(55.7%)events all patients were "obviously dead", and in 27(44.3%)resuscitation by a professional was attempted on at least one patient.Six events occurred in 2018, 10 events in 2019, 17 events in 2020, 16 events in 2021, and 12 events in 2022.27 events were witnessed and eight had bystander CPR on one or more patients, but none of the events had an AED applied.Event etiology included drug toxicity (n = 21), trauma (n = 11), smoke inhalation (n = 7), no obvious cause (n = 4), drowning (n = 3), hanging (n = 1), and chemical poisoning (n = 1).The mean(SD) age of patients was 44.6(18.4)years with five patients (3.9%) under 18 years, and 41 (32.3%) patients female.Initial heart rhythm of treated patients included 29 (55.8%)asystole, 12 (23.1%)pulseless electrical activity, 9 (17.3%)"non-shockable", one (1.9%)v-fibrillation, and one (1.9%)"shockable".Of the 52 treated patients, 14 (26.9%)achieved field return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and 30 (57.7%) were transported to hospital.Approximately one in every 1,400 cardiac arrest events were a MOHCA, the majority are due to drug toxicity, one-fourth of treated patients achieved field ROSC, and over half were transported.Future research will explore paramedic experience with these low-frequency high-acuity events and develop general triaging guidelines. LO2 Characteristics and predictors of opioid-associated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A retrospective analysis in southern Ontario

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.400
Threshold uncertainty score0.363

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation and Emergency MedicineSame topicCardiac Arrest and ResuscitationFrench-language works237,207