MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416863074 · doi:10.29309/tpmj/2025.32.12.9828

Topical tranexamic acid compared with anterior nasal packing treatment of epistaxis in patients taking antiplatelet drugs.

2025· article· W4416863074 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Professional Medical Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicVascular Anomalies and Treatments
Canadian institutionsSmiths Detection (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTranexamic acidNasal packingRandomized controlled trialBlood lossHemostasisClinical trial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of anterior nasal packing and topical tranexamic acid in treating epistaxis in patients on antiplatelet medications. Study Design: Randomized Controlled Trail. Setting: Emergency Department of Ziauddin University Hospital, Karachi. Period: 21-5-2024 to 5-5-2025. Methods: Those patients who presented with anterior epistaxis were randomised by using the lottery method to receive anterior nasal packing (ANP) or topical application of tranexamic acid (TXA), with 30 patients in each group. In the case group, patients were treated with topical tranexamic acid, while in the control group, patients were treated with ANP. The Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS version 25) was utilized for interpretation of collected data. Results: Of the 60 epistaxis patients, majority of epistaxis patients were male (55.0%, n=33), and the remaining were female (45.0%, n=27), with an average age of 59.2 ± 8.3 years. Mean cessation time of bleeding in epistaxis patients was 7.1 ± 3.4 min in the case (TXA) group and 13.4 ± 4.9 min in the control (ANP) group (p-value < 0.001). Length of stay in ED in epistaxis patients was significantly lower in the case (TXA) group as compared to the control (ANP) group (p-value=0.042). Rebleeding in epistaxis patients occurred in 10.0% (n=3) in the case (TXA) group and 40.0% (n=12) in the control (ANP) group (p-value=0.007). Treatment in epistaxis patients was satisfactory in 90.0% (n=27) in the case (TXA) group and 66.7% (n=20) in the control (ANP) group (p-value=0.028). Conclusion: The use of topical tranexamic acid instead of anterior nasal packing for the treatment of epistaxis in patients who were on antiplatelet drugs is associated with significantly shorter duration of bleeding control, fewer rebleeding episodes, decreased length of ED stay, and greater satisfaction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.239
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it