MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4416864298 · doi:10.7554/elife.108959

Bivalent mRNA booster encoding virus-like particles elicits potent polyclass receptor-binding domain antibodies in pre-vaccinated mice

2025· article· en· W4416864298 on OpenAlexaff
Chengcheng Fan, Alexander A. Cohen, Kim-Marie A. Dam, Annie V. Rorick, Ange-Célia I Priso Fils, Zhi Yang, Priyanthi N.P. Gnanapragasam, Kathryn E. Huey‐Tubman, Woohyun J Moon, Paulo J.C. Lin, Pamela J. Björkman, Magnus A. G. Hoffmann

Bibliographic record

VenueeLife · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Canadian institutionsAcuitas Therapeutics (Canada)
FundersWellcome LeapHouston Methodist Research InstituteNational Institutes of HealthMerkin Institute for Translational Research, California Institute of TechnologyTulane UniversityCalifornia Institute of TechnologyFast GrantsGeorge Mason UniversityBill and Melinda Gates Foundation
KeywordsBivalent (engine)EpitopeAntibodyPolyclonal antibodiesMessenger RNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

mRNA vaccines emerged as a leading vaccine technology during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, their sustained protective efficacies were limited by relatively short-lived antibody responses and the emergence of SARS-CoV-2 variants, necessitating frequent and variant-updated boosters. We recently developed the ESCRT- and ALIX-binding region (EABR) mRNA vaccine platform, which encodes engineered immunogens that induce budding of enveloped virus-like particles (eVLPs) from the plasma membrane, thereby resulting in presentation of immunogens on cell surfaces and eVLPs. Prior studies showed that spike (S)-EABR mRNA-LNP immunizations elicited enhanced neutralizing antibody responses against ancestral and variant SARS-CoV-2 compared with conventional S mRNA-LNP in naïve mice, but the effectiveness of S-EABR mRNA-LNP boosters in the context of pre-existing immunity has not been investigated. Here, we evaluated monovalent Wuhan-Hu-1 (Wu1) and bivalent (Wu1/BA.5) S-EABR mRNA-LNP boosters in mice pre-vaccinated with conventional Wu1 S mRNA-LNP. Compared to conventional S mRNA-LNP boosters, the EABR approach enhanced monovalent and bivalent mRNA-LNP booster-induced neutralizing responses against Omicron subvariants BA.1, BA.5, BQ.1.1, and XBB.1, with bivalent S-EABR mRNA-LNP consistently eliciting the highest titers. Epitope mapping of polyclonal antisera by deep mutational scanning revealed that bivalent S-EABR mRNA-LNP boosted diverse 'polyclass' anti-receptor-binding domain (RBD) responses, suggesting balanced targeting of multiple RBD epitope classes. In contrast, monovalent S, bivalent S, and monovalent S-EABR mRNA-LNP boosters elicited less diverse polyclonal serum responses primarily targeting immunodominant RBD epitopes. Cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) structures demonstrated that bivalent mRNA immunizations promote S heterotrimer formation, potentially enhancing bivalent S-EABR mRNA-LNP booster-induced antibody breadth and polyclass epitope targeting by activating cross-reactive B cells through intra-S crosslinking. These findings support the future design of bivalent or multivalent S-EABR mRNA-LNP boosters as a promising strategy to confer broader, and therefore potentially more durable, protection against emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants and other rapidly evolving viruses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeLife→Same topicSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research→French-language works237,207→