УЧАСТИЕ НОГАЙЦЕВ В НАРОДНО-ОСВОБОДИТЕЛЬНОМ ДВИЖЕНИИ ГОРЦЕВ СЕВЕРНОГО КАВКАЗА В КОНЦЕ XVIII – В ПЕРВОЙ ЧЕТВЕРТИ XIX В.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Данная статья посвящена участию ногайцев в народно-освободительных движениях горцев Северного Кавказа, а также рассмотрению хода событий и мотивов участвовавших в них людей. Борьба сплотила разные народы Кавказа. Идеи шейха Мансура о введении шариата получила развитие у последующих имамов. Причиной протестного движения стала репрессивная политика царской администрации без учета местных реалий. Показан завершающий этап движения шейха Мансура, когда вместе с другими народами Кавказа активное участие в ней приняли ногайцы и адыги. В первой четверти XIX в. ногайцы из числа эндиреевских, костековских, аксаевских приняли участие в движении имама Гази-Магомеда. Военные действия происходили в период строительства крепости Внезапной. После карательных походов генерал-майора Вельяминова ногайцы вернулись на прежние места. This article examines the Nogai people's participation in the national liberation movements of the North Caucasus highlanders, as well as the course of events and the motives of those involved. The struggle united the diverse peoples of the Caucasus. Sheikh Mansur's ideas on the introduction of Sharia were further developed by subsequent Imams. The reason for the protest movement was the repressive policy of the tsarist administration without taking into account local realities. The final stage of Sheikh Mansour's movement is shown, when, together with other peoples of the Caucasus, Nogais and Adygs took an active part in it. In the first quarter of the 19th century, Nogais from among the Endireyevsky, Kostekovsky, Aksayevsky took part in the movement of Imam Gazi-Magomed. Military operations took place during the construction of the Sudden fortress. After the punitive campaigns of Major General Velyaminov, the Nogais returned to their former places.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".