MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416866030 · doi:10.5206/mt.v5i4.23652

The Role Of Maple Learn In Teaching And Learning Calculus Through Mathematical Thinking

2025· article· W4416866030 on OpenAlex
Asia Majeed, Callum Laverance

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueMaple Transactions · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicChemical and Environmental Engineering Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooUniversity of Toronto
FundersOffice of International Science and EngineeringMitacs
KeywordsGeneralizationMapleFocus (optics)Mathematical problemMathematical logicCalculus (dental)Mathematical software

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In mathematical thinking, specialization, conjecturing, and generalization are essential processes through which the information of a solution is examined to generate a new idea. Technology supports these processes by enabling interactive explorations that allow learners to observe how results change as initial data vary. In this study, we focus on mathematical thinking, specifically specialization, conjecturing, and generalization using Maple Learn. By leveraging Maple Learn’s functionalities, we design an activity that promotes mathematical thinking while also facilitating mathematical procedures, visualization, communication, and the development of deep conceptual understanding. In this paper, our goal is to provide instructors with a framework to encourage high levels of mathematical thinking in learners of calculus.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.938
Threshold uncertainty score0.738

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it