Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This issue closes Volume 87 of the Canadian Journal of Optometry (CJO) and with it, a year of many changes. With a new publisher mid-year, we now have a new Managing Editor, Virginia St-Denis, and Associate Editor, Jessica Cyr, who are managing article submissions and peer review, editing accepted papers, and laying out each issue. The result is improved legibility of the text of the articles and increased accessibility for people with disabilities.We will soon be migrating the CJO to a new web portal with the Public Knowledge Project at Simon Fraser University. Moving to the creators of our Online Journal System will increase the service level that we can provide, which is part of our long-term goal of making the CJO more accessible to a worldwide audience through search engines and indexing services. The benefit will be an enhanced profile for Canadian optometry as a unique branch of the profession.Going forward, the editorial team hopes the CJO will attract more original research and clinical reports that will better inform your practice to the benefit of your patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.020 | 0.010 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.027 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it