MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416868411 · doi:10.1016/j.sleep.2025.108692

Exploring relationships between sleep quality and clinical depression in the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging

2025· article· en· W4416868411 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Samia Salame, Tetyana Kendzerska, Stacey Fisher, Douglas G. Manuel, Amy T. Hsu

Bibliographic record

VenueSleep Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSleep and related disorders
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalBruyère
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsDepression (economics)Longitudinal studyOddsSleep (system call)CohortCohort studyOdds ratioLogistic regressionIncidence (geometry)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sleep plays an important role in cognitive function, such as emotional regulation, which is important for a higher quality of life. The study objective was to explore the association between baseline sleep quality and 6-year incidence of clinical depression. Using data from the Comprehensive cohort of the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging from baseline (2011-2015) to follow-up 2 (2018-2021), a total cohort of 13,997 middle aged and older Canadians free of self-reported diagnosis of clinical depression at baseline was obtained wherein the baseline mean age was 66 years (SD = 7.8), 50.3 % were female, 5.7 % were non-white, and 4.3 % had incident depression by follow-up 2. Sleep-related exposures included self-reported sleep quality (ranging from very dissatisfied to very satisfied), sleep duration, sleep frequencies (initiation difficulty, maintenance difficulty, daytime sleepiness), and symptoms of sleep disorders (sleep apnea, acting out dreams while asleep, restless leg syndrome). Multivariable regression models were used to assess the association between self-reported incident clinical depression and each sleep exposure, adjusting for several covariates (age, sex, sociodemographic, and health characteristics). Fully adjusted models demonstrated that individuals who were very dissatisfied with their sleep quality had 1.6 times the odds of reporting new depression while those with satisfied sleep had 1.2 times the odds of reporting new depression, compared to those who reported very satisfied sleep. Those with ≤4 h of sleep and those with 10+ hours of sleep had a higher predicted probability of having depression by 6-year follow-up, compared to those with 7 to 8 hours of sleep. This analysis suggests that poorer sleep quality may be associated with incident clinical depression, supporting the potential benefit of preventative measures and improvements to individuals' sleep in reducing the risk of depression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.128

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.423
GPT teacher head0.480
Teacher spread0.056 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueSleep MedicineSame topicSleep and related disordersFrench-language works237,207