MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416870515 · doi:10.1097/upj.0000000000000936

Reducing Missed Outpatient Appointments in Pediatric Urology: A Pre-Post Analysis of an Automated Text Reminder Intervention

2025· article· en· W4416870515 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueUrology Practice · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicElectronic Health Records Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntervention (counseling)Tertiary careOutpatient clinicPatient carePrimary care

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Missed outpatient appointments, or no-shows, decrease clinic efficiency and are a major challenge in delivering high-quality, cost-effective care. Given the ubiquity of smartphones, automated text reminders are an attractive tool to promote appointment adherence. Thus, our study aims to describe the prevalence and predictors of pediatric urology clinic appointment no-shows and the effectiveness of an automated text reminder system. METHODS: We surveyed all in-person and telehealth pediatric urology clinic appointments within our institution's health system from January to December 2023. Ethnicity, native language, need for interpreter, clinic site, visit type, appointment time, and insurance type were measured. The primary outcome was appointment no-show rate. Secondary outcomes were appointment cancellation and rescheduling rates. Odds for no-show, cancellation, and rescheduling were compared between the preintervention and postintervention groups. A univariate and multinomial logistic regression model was used with attended visits as the reference for the outcome. RESULTS: A total of 15,315 outpatient urology clinic appointments were scheduled; 60.0% attended, 24.1% rescheduled, 9.4% cancelled, and 6.5% missed/no-show. Implementation of text reminders was associated with more visit cancellations (odds ratio [OR] 1.20 [1.01-1.42]), but fewer rescheduled visits (OR 0.78 [0.70-0.86]) and no-shows (OR 0.72 [0.60-0.85]). Spanish language, follow-up visits, and nurse visits were less likely to no-show (OR 0.66 [0.54-0.79], 0.80 [0.68-0.93], and 0.15 [0.06-0.37], respectively). Patients with public-payer insurance or appointments before 10:00 am had a higher odds of no-show (OR 3.38 [1.95-5.86] and 1.25 [1.04-1.51], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: An automated text reminder system is effective in reducing no-show rates for pediatric urology clinic appointments in an academic tertiary care setting.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.179
Threshold uncertainty score0.885

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.457
Teacher spread0.424 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it