MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

AI-Driven Threat Intelligence Framework for Real-Time Cybersecurity using Federated Deep Learning and Cloud Orchestration

2025· article· W4416875247 on OpenAlexaff
N. Venkatesh, Venkata Kartik Pidatala, S M Hemalatha, Prashanthi Matam, R. Stalinbabu, S Srimathi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Security and Intrusion Detection
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrchestrationCloud computingIntrusion detection systemDeep learningOverhead (engineering)Benchmark (surveying)Reliability (semiconductor)Data modeling

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As cyber risks targeting distributed infrastructures are expanding rapidly, centralized detection methods are becoming problematic on all fronts: scalability, privacy, and latency. The paper introduces a new artificial intelligence-based threat intelligence framework that incorporates federated deep learning and cloud orchestration into the framework to achieve real-time, privacy-preserving cybersecurity. The structure makes use of a hybrid CNN-BiLSTM network plus edge-node attention controls accurate recognition of temporal-spatial attack patterns on small data volumes without releasing sensitive data. FedProx algorithm is used to synchronize the model updates to facilitate heterogeneous data distributions. Cloud orchestration with Kubernetes provides a highly available and elastic distribution of detected nodes, in a fault tolerant manner. On benchmark intrusion detection data sets NSL-KDD and CICIDS2017, the system is evaluated to be 97.8 accurate, outperforming existing centralized and federated models in both communication overhead and detection latency. The method shows that real-time cyber threat intelligence can be addressed with a scalable, secure and robust solution with potential protective implications to both enterprises and critical infrastructures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNetwork Security and Intrusion DetectionFrench-language works237,207