MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416876527 · doi:10.37665/smoqddc19955

iNEMI Optoelectronics Roadmap for 2004

2005· article· W4416876527 on OpenAlexaff
Laura J. Turbini

Bibliographic record

VenueSMTA International · 2005
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicSpace Technology and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVolume (thermodynamics)Emerging technologiesTechnology roadmapReliability (semiconductor)Electronic packagingChip

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT The iNEMI Optoelectronic Roadmap for 2004 is focused on optical communication. After reviewing the business picture – which includes the probable irreversible move of commodity-like volume manufacture to Asia and low cost labor geographies, it identifies technology changes on the horizon. The chapters are divided by packaging level into Level 0 (on chip interconnections), Level 1 (packaged devices), and Level 2 (modules and card assemblies). Emerging technologies may impact optical interconnects are also discussed. The appendix describes global standards including the JISSO packaging levels and the IPC standards development work.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.072
Threshold uncertainty score0.241

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0720.044

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSMTA InternationalSame topicSpace Technology and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207