MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416876997 · doi:10.37665/smxjblm92161

High Volume Lead Free Production

2001· article· W4416876997 on OpenAlex
Stephen Wong, Myron Nestor

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSMTA International · 2001
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicElectronic Packaging and Soldering Technologies
Canadian institutionsCustom Security Industries (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLead (geology)SolderingProduction (economics)MistakeReliability (semiconductor)Process (computing)Product (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT The electronic industry throughout Europe, Japan, and North America is debating the issue of Lead elimination in electronic assembly. Many conferences and technical consortium are held to discuss lead free solder alternatives. Mostly, their goal has been to try to understand the real implications of switching to a Lead free solder material and process compared to our current electronic assembly practice. Even now, there is still debate on the choice of a direct drop in lead free solder material replacement, particularly regarding concerns over of higher processing temperatures and component compatibility. Over the past 2-½ years, we have successfully developed the first high volume Lead Free process. The product and process development included solder joint integrity research, product life reliability qualifications and production mistake proofing. This paper summarizes the steps required to implement a high volume Lead Free SMT process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.305
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it