MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4416879914 · doi:10.1681/asn.2025e1qedmy2

Cardiovascular Risk Prediction Modelling with Sotagliflozin in Type 1 Diabetes: Analysis of inTandem 1-3 Trials

2025· article· en· W4416879914 on OpenAlexaff
Vikas S. Sridhar, Luxcia Kugathasan, Massimo Nardone, Michael J. Davies, Manon Girard, David Z.I. Cherney

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetes Management and Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClinical trialMEDLINERisk assessmentPredictive modellingLogistic regression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Sodium-glucose cotransporter (SGLT) inhibitors reduce cardiovascular risk in people with type 2 diabetes. It is unknown if this extends to individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D). To understand the potential benefits of SGLT inhibition in T1D, we applied the Scottish Diabetes Research Network (SDRN) risk prediction models to estimate cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in people with T1D treated with sotagliflozin, a dual SGLT1&2 inhibitor. Methods: In a patient-level analysis, medical history, demographic and biochemical data were extracted from 2829 participants with T1D pooled from the inTandem1-3 trials. The SDRN risk prediction model was employed at baseline and week 24 to estimate the 10-year CVD. Risk reduction was calculated as the percent and absolute change in estimated CVD risk from baseline and compared between sotagliflozin (pooled 200 and 400mg) and placebo groups using a two-way repeated measures ANOVA. The log-transformed change in relative (absolute) risk from baseline was the dependent variable, treatment and visit as fixed effect, and log-transformed baseline value as covariate. Subgroup analyses were based on baseline CVD risk (<10%, 10 to 20%, ≥20%) and baseline chronic kidney disease (CKD) risk defined by KDIGO. Results: Baseline SDRN risk score was approximately 11%. Sotagliflozin significantly reduced the estimated 10-year CVD risk following 24 weeks of treatment compared with placebo. Placebo adjusted relative change from baseline was -7.0% (95% CI -8.4, -5.5; p<0.0001). Placebo adjusted absolute change from baseline was -0.9% (95% CI -1.2, -0.7; p<0.0001). Results were consistent across subgroups based on baseline CVD and CKD risk, with evidence of greater risk reduction in those at higher CVD and CKD risk. Conclusion: Sotagliflozin improves predicted CVD risk in T1D participants at low cardiorenal risk. By highlighting the predicted cardiovascular risk benefit in a large low-risk T1D cohort, our findings underline the need to investigate the effect of SGLT inhibitors on hard cardiovascular endpoints in T1D, especially in high-risk cohorts. Funding: Commercial Support - Lexicon pharmaceuticals

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.053
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.054
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score0.282

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0530.054
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.013
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology→Same topicDiabetes Management and Research→French-language works237,207→