MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4416880024 · doi:10.2196/71625

Health Motivation as a Predictor of mHealth Engagement Across BMI: Cross-Sectional Survey

2025· article· en· W4416880024 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Shao-Hsuan Chang, Lung‐Kun Yeh, Daishi Chen, Kae‐Kuen Hu, Mei‐Ching Yu, Ching‐Mao Chang

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR mhealth and uhealth · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicMobile Health and mHealth Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsmHealthDigital healtheHealthHealth dataHealth behaviorHealth recordsMedical recordSelf-determination theory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Digital health tools, such as mobile apps and wearable devices, have been widely adopted to support self-management of health behaviors. However, user engagement remains inconsistent, particularly among populations with varying BMI. While digital health technologies have the potential to promote healthier behaviors, little is known about how psychological and behavioral factors interact with BMI to influence use patterns. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore the relationship between BMI and digital health technology use and to examine how factors such as health awareness, self-efficacy, and health motivation contribute to technology engagement. METHODS: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted from January 2024 to April 2024. A total of 184 valid questionnaire participants were included in this study. The questionnaire was measured on a 5-point Likert scale. Descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and multiple regression analyses were applied. RESULTS: . Significant BMI differences were observed based on sex (P<.001) and age (P<.001) but not based on prior digital health tool use. Use rates for Bluetooth or Wi-Fi devices, wearables, and mobile apps were 32.1% (59/184), 38.6% (71/184), and 39.1% (72/184), respectively. A negative correlation between BMI and mobile app use frequency was identified (P=.02). Multiple regression analysis indicated that health motivation significantly predicted digital health use (P<.001), whereas health awareness, lifestyle, and self-efficacy did not. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with higher BMI reported a lower frequency of digital health tool use, potentially due to lower health motivation in the studied population. Health motivation was the strongest predictor of digital health engagement. Integrating personalized medical records into apps may enhance health motivation, thereby improving user engagement and promoting healthier behaviors in individuals with higher BMI.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.149
GPT teacher head0.532
Teacher spread0.383 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR mhealth and uhealth→Same topicMobile Health and mHealth Applications→French-language works237,207→