MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416880171 · doi:10.37665/smtwccs51989

Development of Laser Trimming of Embedded Resistors for Printed Circuit Board Manufacturing

2002· article· W4416880171 on OpenAlexaff
A. Naumov, Anton Kitai

Bibliographic record

VenueSMTA International · 2002
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrical and Thermal Properties of Materials
Canadian institutionsOTI Lumionics (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResistorPrinted circuit boardTrimmingElectronic componentReliability (semiconductor)Circuit reliabilityElectronic circuitIntegrated circuit

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT In the printed circuit board industry, the growing demand for a higher number of circuit components to be contained in smaller circuit areas requires that some of the passive components (resistors, capacitors, etc) are now embedded within the board. This allows for tighter component placement with lower via counts and has also increased the reliability of these devices. For thick film resistors, the resistor paste for embedded resistors is usually screen-printed on the surface of the PWB laminate (either copper or dielectric) that is patterned according to the circuit design. Current technologies require wet paste that is oven cured after placement. This paste process results in a resistor with a tolerance of 10-50% from the target value. Thin film resistors deposited on the PWB also show variation in their values. Resistor trimming is required to bring this tolerance down to about 1-5% as required by the PWB design. This paper discusses the implementation of passive resistor trimming for large panel manufacturing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSMTA InternationalSame topicElectrical and Thermal Properties of MaterialsFrench-language works237,207