MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416880560 · doi:10.71403/10b17252

Une recherche collaborative sur les situations-problèmes en mathématiques au primaire : évolution des pratiques déclarées d’enseignantes

2025· article· W4416880560 on OpenAlexaff
Nathalie Anwandter Cuellar, Geneviève Lessard, Julie Bergeron, Virginie Robert

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue québécoise de didactique des mathématiques · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, sociology, and vocational training
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalUniversité du Québec en Outaouais
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Qualitative researchIdentity (music)Qualitative analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article présente une partie des résultats d’une recherche collaborative sur les situations-problèmes en mathématiques au primaire. Plus particulièrement, nous avons analysé de manière qualitative la rencontre bilan de cette recherche. Pour ce faire, les composantes des pratiques du cadre théorique de la double approche didactique et ergonomique nous ont permis de décrire l’évolution des pratiques déclarées des six enseignantes participantes. Cette étude montre comment le processus d’action commune, de coformation et de corecherche, a contribué au renouvellement des pratiques concernant la situation-problème.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.026
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.190
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.026
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0040.005
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.148
GPT teacher head0.413
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue québécoise de didactique des mathématiquesSame topicEducation, sociology, and vocational trainingFrench-language works237,207