MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416884911 · doi:10.37665/srsmqdf66744

Microstructural Evaluation of Low and No-Ag, Bi-Containing Pb-Free Solders

2015· article· W4416884911 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSoldering and Reliability Conferences · 2015
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicElectronic Packaging and Soldering Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSolderingEutectic systemMicrostructureSupercoolingAlloySolder pasteBall grid arrayJoint (building)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT This paper describes the solidification characteristics of solder joints formed using three different Low (or no) Ag, Bi-contaioning Pb-free alloys. It considers the effects of Cu dissolution, undercooling and IMC formation on the bulk solder. The formation of interfacial IMCs is also evaluated with both Cu-Sn and Cu-Ni-Sn systems being considered. This work also investigates the impact of Bi on both the bulk solder and the interfacial IMC. Of the three solders being evaluated, two have a near-eutectic composition in a quaternary system, while a third has a composition along the eutectic valley of a ternary compound. The properties and microstructures of each are compared to SAC305. This study includes the evaluation of solder joints formed on QFPs, and therefore primarily made up of the alloy under study as well as solder joints formed using BGAs having a solder ball composition of SAC305; therefore the combined solder joint is made up of the alloy under study mixed with SAC305. This work considers the solidification which occurs in a typical assembly reflow process and is therefore representative of “as manufactured” product.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.685
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it