MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416885157 · doi:10.37665/srmgyhu97108

Fracture Behavior of a Lead-Free Solder/Cu Joint System

2008· article· W4416885157 on OpenAlexaff
Siva Nadimpalli, J.K. Spelt

Bibliographic record

VenueSoldering and Reliability Conferences · 2008
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicElectronic Packaging and Soldering Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFracture toughnessJoint (building)Fracture (geology)Crack tip opening displacementFracture mechanicsCrack growth resistance curveSoldering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT The quasi-static strength of a solder joint is often a critical performance parameter that is mainly governed by its fracture properties. In this study, the fracture toughness of a lead-free solder (96.5Sn3Ag0.5Cu)/Cu joint system has been measured using a double cantilever beam (DCB) specimen consisting of two Cu bars joined by a uniform layer of lead-free solder, 0.4 mm thick. The fracture toughness was measured at relatively low strain rates as a function of crack length and the initial crack tip geometry and phase angle. The crack front was often observed to be highly three-dimensional and variable, with sections advancing near both the upper and lower copper bars. The solder microstructures were analyzed along these fracture surfaces. Initially, the fracture toughness increased with crack length, attaining a steady-state value after 10-20 mm of crack extension. Both the steady-state value and the slope of the rising part of the R-curve were largely independent of the initial crack tip geometry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSoldering and Reliability ConferencesSame topicElectronic Packaging and Soldering TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207