JASPAR 2026: expansion of transcription factor binding profiles and integration of deep learning models
Bibliographic record
Abstract
JASPAR (https://jaspar.elixir.no/) is an open-access database that has provided high-quality, manually curated, and non-redundant DNA binding profiles for transcription factors (TFs) as position frequency matrices (PFMs) for over 20 years. We expanded the CORE (306 new profiles, 12% increase) and UNVALIDATED (433, 60% increase) collections with new PFMs and updated 13 existing profiles. We updated the TF binding site predictions and genome tracks for eight species. TF binding profile clusters and familial TF binding sites were updated accordingly. We integrate the inMOTIFin software to easily simulate regulatory sequences using JASPAR PFMs. To enrich TFs' annotations, we provide scientific literature-based human TF target information. Notably, this release features a deep learning (DL) collection, providing a paradigm shift in modeling and characterizing TF-DNA interactions with 1259 BPNet models trained on Homo sapiens ENCODE chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing (ChIP-seq) datasets from 240 TFs and interpreted to reveal predictive motif patterns for the models. The motifs associated with the same TF were clustered to provide a summary of the binding properties, resulting in 240 primary and 113 alternative motif patterns in the DL collection. The JASPAR 2026 collections lay a foundation for future endeavors in genomic research, serving the scientific community in uncovering the mechanisms of gene regulation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".