Factors influencing immediate post-angiographic occlusion outcomes in intracranial aneurysms treated with the woven endobridge device: a multi-center analysis and predictive model from the WorldWideWEB consortium
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device treats wide-necked bifurcation aneurysms, but occlusion rates vary. This study aims to identify factors associated with immediate WEB device occlusion. Data from patients treated with WEB devices across 36 sites were analyzed. Machine learning algorithms and ordinal regression models were developed to predict immediate incomplete occlusion for ruptured and unruptured aneurysms. The study included 1565 patients, with 436 ruptured and 1129 unruptured aneurysms. Immediate complete occlusion was achieved in 38.3% of ruptured and 32.8% of unruptured aneurysms. For ruptured aneurysms, the CatBoost classifier achieved an AUROC of 0.69. Key predictors of incomplete occlusion included pretreatment mRS, aneurysm diameter, and MCA location. Ordinal regression revealed that smoking history (OR: 1.95, p < 0.001), neck diameter (Odds Ratio [OR]: 1.50, p < 0.001), and presence of a branch from the aneurysm (OR: 2.06, p = 0.016) were associated with incomplete, while bifurcation aneurysms (OR: 0.55, p = 0.017) were associated with complete immediate occlusion. For unruptured aneurysms, the CatBoost classifier achieved an AUROC of 0.68. Significant predictors of immediate incomplete occlusion included aneurysm neck width, MCA location, and presence of daughter sac. Ordinal regression revealed that smoking history (OR: 1.29, p = 0.032), neck diameter (OR: 1.24, p < 0.001), and presence of a daughter sac (OR: 1.53, p = 0.005) were associated with incomplete, while bifurcation aneurysms (OR: 0.71, p = 0.02) and posterior circulation location (OR: 0.68, p = 0.01) were associated with complete immediate occlusion. Careful evaluation of patient demographics and specific aneurysm characteristics may help improve the outcomes of intracranial aneurysms treated with WEB device.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".