3D digitalizácia konkrétneho zariadenia pre simulovanie montážneho postupu vo virtuálnej realite
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Anotace: Článok sa zaoberá digitalizáciou vybraného zariadenia a návrhom simulácie montážneho postupu vo virtuálnej realite na príklade prestavby bežného bicykla Maxbike Taal 29″ na elektrobicykel pomocou centrálneho pohonu Bafang BBS02N s výkonom 750 W (max. 120 Nm) a rámovej batérie.Metodika zahŕňa 3D modelovanie komponentov v CAD systéme SolidWorks, prípravu a optimalizáciu dát pre vizualizáciu v Pixyz Review, vytvorenie VR pracoviska a definovanie interaktívnych krokov montáže a demontáže vrátane nastavení stupňov voľnosti pre manipuláciu s dielmi a náradím.Implementácia bola realizovaná pre headset Oculus Rift S s ovládačmi Touch.Výsledkom je funkčná VR aplikácia, ktorá umožňuje bezpečný nácvik postupov, poskytuje prehľadný vizuálny návod, podporuje analýzu ergonómie a má potenciál skrátiť čas zaškolenia, znížiť chybovosť a náklady na fyzické prototypy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.028 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".