Study on the Dynamic Properties of a Long freight Wagon, from a Safety Point of View, when Running on a Track
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Railway transport of goods represents a crucial part of the transport system in many countries.Currently, containers' intermodal transport has a significant ratio of goods transport and rail vehicles, i.e., freight wagons for intermodal transport across the border of countries.As it is an international transport means, freight wagons need to be designed to meet the operational conditions of all countries in which they are used.The presented research is focused on the investigation of the dynamic properties of a long freight wagon.This wagon is designed for intermodal transport, and it is equipped with two Y25 bogies.The research is performed using a scientific method based on multibody system dynamics.Output quantities in a wheel/rail contact, such as vertical wheel forces Q, lateral wheel forces Y and the derailment quotient Y/Q, are evaluated.Simulation computations are carried out in commercial multi-body software.A railway track model corresponds to a real track section.The results of the performed research showed that the load of the wagon equipped with the Y25 bogie significantly influences the dynamic properties of the wagon under operational conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".