MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416905757 · doi:10.1111/jan.70417

Nursing Education: Past Milestones and Future Horizons

2025· article· en· W4416905757 on OpenAlexaff
Lorelli Nowell

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Advanced Nursing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicNursing education and management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNurse educationHealth careWorkforceCurriculumPreparednessInterprofessional educationProfessional developmentTeam nursingNursing shortage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

IntroductionNursing education has undergone substantial transformation over the past five decades, evolving in response to changes in healthcare delivery, professional standards and societal expectations.The transition from hospital-based training to academic degree programs emphasised evidence-based practice, technology integration, cultural responsiveness and interprofessional collaboration.These developments have strengthened educational quality and expanded nursing's role in healthcare delivery.However, nursing education will continue to face considerable challenges in the coming decades, including technological advancement, workforce shortages and the need for enhanced preparedness for global health threats.In this commentary, I examine key developments in nursing education over the past 50 years and discuss emerging challenges that may influence its future direction.Moving forward nursing education is likely to require innovation while maintaining nursing's core values of compassion, advocacy and patient-centred care. | Evolution of Nursing Education Over the Past Five Decades |

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.055

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.005
Scholarly communication0.0080.012
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0050.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Advanced NursingSame topicNursing education and managementFrench-language works237,207