Inserting the dead in living spaces in Bronze Age Southern Italy: the case of Coppa Nevigata
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Burial in the Italian Bronze Age is often thought to consist mostly of single burials, cremations in necropolises or collective burials in tombs. Multidisciplinary study of Coppa Nevigata (Apulia), an important fortified living and trading site on the Adriatic coast, also provides exceptional evidence for a range of funerary rituals. Combining archaeological context and bioarchaeological analysis with new studies of funerary taphonomy, we trace three core modes of deposition within this habitation site: burial, exposure and intentional secondary deposition of single bones, with evident movement of remains between all funerary contexts. Integrated with new isotopic and aDNA analyses, some differences emerge between these three depositional modes. As a result, we suggest that these diverse deathways were motivated by a range of factors, including the power of bones and ancestors, sentiments of group belonging, and political claims.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it