Pediatric Adenoidectomy With Laryngeal Mask Airway in the Minor Procedure Room: A Quality Improvement Project
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ImportanceExpanding the appropriate use of ambulatory surgical care may improve operating room (OR) efficiency.ObjectiveTo demonstrate that pediatric adenoidectomy with laryngeal mask airway (LMA) for select patients in the minor procedure room (MPR) is comparable in safety but more efficient than OR adenoidectomy in a pilot study of 20 patients from July to November 2023.DesignThe Institute for Healthcare Improvement Model for Improvement guided this quality improvement project. Safety and efficiency outcomes were prospectively collected for adenoidectomies with LMA in the MPR and compared with retrospective data from similar OR cases with LMA or endotracheal intubation (ETT).SettingA single tertiary referral center.ParticipantsPediatric patients who underwent adenoidectomy from July to November 2023.InterventionsThe intervention involved adenoidectomy in the MPR with LMA, as opposed to traditional OR settings.Main Outcome MeasuresThe main outcome measures included safety (perioperative respiratory adverse events, conversion from LMA to ETT), efficiency (length of hospital stay, wait time for surgery), and patient/provider satisfaction.ResultsFinal analysis included 55 patients [20 (36%) MPR, 35 (64%) OR]. In the OR, 16 (46%) patients used LMA, the rest used ETT. The median [interquartile range (IQR)] age was 5.5 (3.7-7.3) years, and 22 (41%) patients were female. No major respiratory adverse events occurred in the MPR compared to 1 (3%) event in the OR. One (5%) MPR patient required conversion from LMA to ETT due to limited surgical access. Time-based measures were superior in the MPR, with median hospital stay 91 minutes shorter (158.0; IQR: 143.0-204.0 vs 249.0; IQR: 210.0-278.0). Patient and provider satisfaction were highly rated in the MPR.ConclusionsPediatric adenoidectomy for select patients in the MPR is a safe and time-efficient alternative to the OR.RelevanceFurther exploration of suitable procedures for the MPR may enhance OR resource allocation.Level of Evidence. 3.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.015 | 0.018 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".