MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416910653 · doi:10.2106/jbjs.oa.25.00034

A Retrospective Review of Intra-articular Methylprednisolone Hip Injection and Development of Rapidly Progressive Idiopathic Arthritis in Adults

2025· review· en· W4416910653 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJBJS Open Access · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone and Joint Diseases
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRetrospective cohort studyArthritisRheumatoid arthritisMethylprednisoloneHip arthroplasty

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Rapidly progressive idiopathic arthritis (RPIA) of the hip is a rare, poorly understood, destructive hip disease. Etiologies are understudied; however, recent literature suggests a causal relationship between intra-articular corticosteroid hip injections and the development of RPIA. This study's primary objective was to identify the prevalence of RPIA following methylprednisolone intra-articular hip injections (IAHI) and assess these cases' baseline characteristics. Methods: Patients who received at least 1 fluoroscopy-guided methylprednisolone IAHI into a native hip between January 2010 and December 2019, had available preinjection and postinjection images, and met inclusion criteria were enrolled. Demographic variables, injection dose and laterality, and number of injections per hip were collected from electronic medical records. Postinjection RPIA was determined through imaging review. Results: The total was 1,402 unique hips. The mean age at the time of first injection was 63 (SD = 12.65), and 54% (n = 752) of patients were female. Review of preinjection and postinjection imaging revealed 31 cases of RPIA, thus 2.2% overall prevalence. The mean number of methylprednisolone injections per hip was 1.67 (SD = 1.72), with a mean cumulative dose of 74.91 mg (SD = 84.58). Conditional logistic regression showed each 100 mg increase in cumulative dose was associated with an odds ratio of 0.90 (95% confidence interval 0.59-1.37; p = 0.62). Thus, increasing dose was not significantly associated with the risk of RPIA. Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first study to exclusively analyze methylprednisolone IAHI, which found a lower prevalence of postinjection RPIA than most previous studies. Importantly, cumulative methylprednisolone dose was not significantly associated with an increased risk of RPIA, suggesting that repeat dosing within the studied ranges is unlikely to substantially increase the risk of this complication. Level of Evidence: Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.697
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.417
Teacher spread0.369 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it