Collection of Ambulatory Electrocardiogram and Behavioral Data for the Identification of Digital Biomarkers for Heart Failure (CATCH-ECG): Protocol for a Prospective Cohort Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) is a complex clinical syndrome with a high morbidity and mortality rate. Despite advancements in treatment, the recurrence of HF remains a significant challenge, often leading to deteriorating health conditions and increased pressure on the health care system. Early detection of recurrence is pivotal in mitigating and managing the adverse outcomes associated with HF. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study is to collect data to facilitate the identification of digital biomarkers that may indicate deterioration of the heart and, ultimately, develop algorithms that can predict HF. METHODS: This prospective cohort study is conducted in Copenhagen, Denmark, and will recruit individuals diagnosed with decompensated HF. Participants will be followed for a period of 1 year, during which they will undergo a quarterly assessment period every 3 months. Each quarterly assessment period spans 7 days and involves continuous monitoring using an ambulatory electrocardiogram sensor. Throughout each quarterly assessment period, participants will also complete daily assessments and questionnaires. All data will be collected using a dedicated mobile app installed on the participants' personal smartphones and securely stored in a cloud-based system. RESULTS: This study is part of the Cardio-Share Model for Cross-Sectoral Ambulatory Treatment of Congestive Heart Disease Based on Personal Health Technology project. Technical and regulatory preparation started in 2023. Recruitment for this study started in January 2025 and is expected to be completed by the end of 2026. The dataset will be anonymized and published for further research. CONCLUSIONS: This study aims to provide a comprehensive longitudinal open-source dataset of HF recorded in real-world ambulatory conditions that enhances our understanding of HF signs and symptoms. This dataset will provide an important source for detailed analysis and understanding of HF based on ambulatory and contextual physiological data. Such insight has the potential to enhance the clinical management of individuals with HF and enable them to handle their condition at home. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/79651.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".