Transcriptomic Profiles from Stereo-EEGs May Reflect the Local Brain Cell Microenvironment in Human Epilepsy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Our understanding of the pathomechanisms of epilepsy has improved through techniques that access the living human brain. We recently reported that explanted stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) electrodes from patients with epilepsy carry residual biomolecules and cells, which may be utilised for transcriptome and DNA methylation profiling. METHODS: Here, we applied bioinformatic and other analyses to explore the transcriptomes (RNA sequencing-based) of those SEEG cases to better understand the types of recovered transcripts in terms of representation of genes expressed by different cell types, brain structures, and the extent to which the signal may reflect local epileptiform activity. RESULTS: Electrodes from all clinical cases retained protein-coding transcripts which reflected the local molecular microenvironment as well as epileptiform activity. Expression of genes involved in housekeeping functions, as well as markers of neuronal activity, was consistent between patients and between the electrode locations within the brain. We detected transcripts representing various cell types and subtypes, including excitatory and inhibitory neurons, all major classes of glia, and endothelial cells, as well as transcripts enriched in specific brain regions. Several genes showed a gradient of expression depending on the electrode position within the brain. We found examples of gene expression that correlated with epileptiform activity as recorded by SEEG. CONCLUSIONS: These findings extend the evidence that SEEG electrodes reflect the molecular microenvironments of brain activity in patients with epilepsy, both at sites of seizure onset and within the wider seizure network. The approach has potential applications in intraoperative surgical decision-making, as well as to identify molecular biomarkers or therapeutic targets for the drug-resistant epilepsies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".