MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416915001 · doi:10.7202/1121632ar

Leah R. Clark, Courtly Mediators: Transcultural Objects between Renaissance Italy and the Islamic World, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2023 336 pp., 46 b/w illus., 14 colour plates $130.00 (hardback) ISBN 9781009276191

2024· article· en· W4416915001 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueRACAR Revue d art canadienne · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies of Medieval Iberia
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThe RenaissanceIslamHaven

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Leah R. Clark, Courtly Mediators: Transcultural Objects between Renaissance Italy and the Islamic World, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2023 336 pp., 46 b/w illus., 14 colour plates $130.00 (hardback) ISBN 9781009276191. Un article de la revue RACAR : Revue d'art canadienne / Canadian Art Review (Cripping Visual Cultures) diffusée par la plateforme Érudit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.124
Threshold uncertainty score0.247

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.006
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0060.010
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0410.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRACAR Revue d art canadienneSame topicHistorical Studies of Medieval IberiaFrench-language works237,207