MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416915005 · doi:10.7202/1121625ar

Precarious Life: Disability Aesthetics in the Art of Jean-Michel Basquiat

2024· article· en· W4416915005 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Madelaine Caritas Longman

Bibliographic record

VenueRACAR Revue d art canadienne · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCaribbean and African Literature and Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRace (biology)Context (archaeology)Ethnography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Jean-Michel Basquiat (1960-1988) est salué dans le monde entier pour ses peintures viscérales, ses hommages aux figures de la culture noire et son utilisation de matériaux récupérés. Si la toxicomanie de Basquiat et sa mort prématurée font l’objet de nombreuses spéculations, la précarité dans la forme et le contenu de ses oeuvres a reçu moins d’attention. J’avance qu’un examen critique de cette précarité révèle les préoccupations constantes de Basquiat aux intersections de la race, de la classe sociale et du handicap. Comme l’ont souligné Christopher M. Bell et Jasbir K. Puar, les études sur le handicap n’abordent souvent pas de manière adéquate les questions de race et de classe, bien que les inégalités structurelles influencent profondément le développement du handicap. En apportant des nuances à l’esthétique du handicap théorisée par Tobin Siebers avec les études noires et les écrits de Puar sur la débilité, j’avance que l’oeuvre de Basquiat conteste les effets débilitants de l’antinégritude, du classisme et du colonialisme, tout en incarnant une vitalité résistante.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0130.016
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRACAR Revue d art canadienneSame topicCaribbean and African Literature and CultureFrench-language works237,207