MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Bushmeat consumption in Guinea: implications for public health and one health perspective

2025· article· W4416916037 on OpenAlexafffund
Salifou Talassone Bangoura, Castro Gbèmemali Hounmenou, Aminata Mbaye, Maladho Diaby, Emile Faya Bongono, Abdoul Karim Soumah, Gnouma Laurent Koniono, Haby Diallo, Cécé Kpamou, Justin Masumu, Stéphanie Maltais, Alpha-Kabinet Keita, Abdoulaye Touré, Alioune Camara

Bibliographic record

VenuePAMJ - One Health · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicLivestock and Poultry Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersInternational Development Research Centre
KeywordsBushmeatConsumption (sociology)Socioeconomic statusPublic healthOutbreakPsychological intervention

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: bushmeat is an important source of protein and income for many communities in developing countries, although bushmeat-related activities have been associated with many outbreaks of infectious diseases. In Guinea, its consumption attracted increasing attention since the Ebola epidemic from 2013 to 2016. However, estimates of its national scale consumption are lacking. This study explored the bushmeat consumption in urban areas of Guinea to guide public policies and interventions from a One Health perspective. Methods: the survey was conducted among 901 individuals aged 18 years and over from 458 households across the country's eight administrative regions. A two-stage random sampling method was used to select households. Data were collected through a questionnaire on socioeconomic status, sociodemographic characteristics, bushmeat consumption habits, consumed species, motivations, and sources of supply. A multilayer perceptron neural network analysis was used to identify the factors influencing bushmeat consumption. Results: the overall prevalence of bushmeat consumption was 24%, ranging from 15.9% in Conakry to 50% in N'zérékoré. Bushmeat consumption was 22.8% in poor households, 20.9% in middle-income households and 27.4% in rich households. Bushmeat consumption was mostly occasional (79.4%). The species of bushmeat consumed were mainly aulacodes (42.1%), antelopes (42.1%), primates (21.0%) and hare/rabbit (21.0%). Taste was the main reason for consumption (86.9%) and the main sources of supply were sellers (55.1%) and hunters (41.6%). The multilayer perceptron neural network analysis revealed that males, Christians, and individuals from the Forest ethnic group were the main factors influencing bushmeat consumption. Conclusion: the consumption of bushmeat remains a common practice in Guinea. Therefore, the implementation of effective policies and strategies for reducing the hunting of and dependence on bushmeat, which are based on the One Health approach, could make a major contribution to the conservation of the biodiversity of several species and improve health safety at both the local and global levels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.862
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.181
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePAMJ - One HealthSame topicLivestock and Poultry ManagementFrench-language works237,207