MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416917222 · doi:10.2196/80815

Multimodal Transformer–Based Electrocardiogram Analysis for Cardiovascular Comorbidity Detection: Model Development and Validation Study

2025· article· en· W4416917222 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Qi Guang, Xueqian Ding

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Formative Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicECG Monitoring and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComorbidityDiseaseMEDLINEHeart failurePerspective (graphical)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) remain the leading global cause of mortality, yet traditional electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretation suffers from subjective variability and limited sensitivity to complex pathologies. OBJECTIVE: To address these challenges, we propose the Cardiovascular Multimodal Prediction Network (CaMPNet), a Transformer-based multimodal architecture that integrates raw 12-lead ECG waveforms, nine structured machine-measured the electrocardiogram (ECG) features, and demographic data (age and sex) through cross-attention fusion. METHODS: The model was trained on 384,877 records from the MIMIC-IV-ECG database and evaluated across 12 cardiovascular disease labels. To further assess temporal robustness, a temporal external validation was performed using the most recent 10% of the data, withheld chronologically from model development. RESULTS: On the internal test set, the model achieved a mean Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.845 and Area Under the Precision-Recall Curve (AUPRC) of 0.489, outperforming the ResNet-ECG baseline (AUC 0.848 but F1 0.152) and all single-modality variants. Subgroup analyses demonstrated consistent performance across demographics (male AUC 0.846 vs female 0.843; youngest quartile 0.884 vs oldest 0.811). CaMPNet retained moderate discriminative ability in temporal external validation with a mean AUC of 0.715 and AUPRC of 0.298, though performance declined due to temporal distribution shifts. Despite this, major disease categories such as atrial fibrillation, heart failure, and normal rhythm maintained high AUCs (> 0.84). Attention-based visualization revealed clinically interpretable patterns (e.g., ST-segment elevations in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction), and ablation experiments verified the model's tolerance to missing structured inputs. CONCLUSIONS: CaMPNet demonstrates robust and interpretable multimodal ECG-based diagnosis, offering a scalable framework for comorbidity screening and continual learning under real-world temporal dynamics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.757
Threshold uncertainty score0.509

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.412
Teacher spread0.344 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Formative ResearchSame topicECG Monitoring and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207