MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416920226 · doi:10.1016/j.est.2025.119505

A novel compressed air and thermochemical energy storage system integrated with two-step ceria chemical looping cycle for hydrogen and sulfur production

2025· article· en· W4416920226 on OpenAlexaff
Muhammad Ishaq, İbrahim Dinçer

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Energy Storage · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicChemical Looping and Thermochemical Processes
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemical looping combustionHydrogen productionHydrogen storageSulfurHydrogenCompressed airCompressed air energy storageCompressed hydrogenThermochemical cycle

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A novel compressed air energy and thermochemical energy storage system is holistically integrated with a two-step ceria chemical looping cycle to produce compressed hydrogen, elemental sulfur, and electric power. Unlike conventional methane-based reduction, this process employs hydrogen sulfide as the reducing agent. To implement this concept, the developed integrated energy system is adapted to operate in at least two operational modes (charging thermochemical cycle and discharging thermochemical cycle). Hydrogen sulfide from the industrial waste stream undergoes a two-step ceria chemical looping cycle using an oxygen carrier (OC), CeO 2 /Ce 2 O 3 redox pair. These reduced OC particles (Ce 2 O 3 ) are employed as thermochemical energy storage media to produce additional hydrogen during the discharging mode. The entire system, including both operational modes, is analyzed and modeled in the Aspen Plus software. Several sensitivity analyses, including input feed ratio, temperature, reduced OC flow rates, and oxidized OC flow rate, are conducted to assess the performance of the CeO 2 /Ce 2 O 3 redox pair over hydrogen sulfide. It is found that the charging mode of the thermochemical cycle does not follow stoichiometry, and maximum H 2 production is achieved at an H 2 S/CeO 2 ratio of 0.57. The storage of Ce 2 O 3 particles tends to produce 88.97 % more H 2 during the discharging mode. Both hydrogen and sulfur produced from both operational modes are stored in the tanks with a flow rate of 53.39 kg/day and 3.34 kg/day. The overall performance of the developed system is assessed to be 80.26 % as energy efficiency and 43.11 % as exergy efficiency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.071
Threshold uncertainty score0.925

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Energy StorageSame topicChemical Looping and Thermochemical ProcessesFrench-language works237,207