Optimizing the Reliability of Communication Skills Assessment in Clinical Dentistry: A Generalizability Study
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<ns3:p>Introduction Communication skills are universally recognised as a core competency. This study aims to develop and validate an CCG-adapted instrument for communication skills in clinical settings that can be used by trainees themselves (self-assessment). Methods This study was conducted at Damascus University Dental School, Syria in 2024 within authentic clinical settings. Based on Calgary Cambridge Guide, a 31-item assessment instrument was developed, translated and cross-culturally validated for the Syrian Arabic context. An assessment comprised six consultation sessions with six patients (three real and three standardized) was conducted. After each consultation, students and patients completed the assessment form. A balanced, fully crossed, three-facet design Generalizability (G) and decision (D) studies were used to assess reliability for student and patient assessments. Structural validity was evaluated using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) . Results Self-assessment demonstrated excellent reliability (G-coefficient = 0.93), reaching >0.90 with four cases. Patient assessments showed moderate reliability (G = 0.66), with Decision studies projecting improvements to 0.72 with 8 raters, 0.80 with 13 raters, and ~0.90 with ≥30 raters. Reliability estimates for real patients (G = 0.51) were comparable to standardized patients (G = 0.55), with differences narrowing as rater numbers increased. Exploratory factor analysis indicated a one-factor solution explaining 52.1% of the variance. Conclusion A validated self-assessment tool can foster communication skills development, while real patients provide reliability comparable to standardized patients, offering cost-effective, authentic, and participatory approaches. This first Arabic version of the tool addresses training gaps in communication skills in the Arab region.</ns3:p>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it