Redundancy-Aware Predictive Control Framework for Multi Camera-Based Localization and Tracking of UAV Swarm
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Counter-UAS operations in sensitive airspaces demand resilient and precise surveillance to mitigate evolving drone threats. This paper presents a novel multicamera PTZ (Pan-Tilt-Zoom) framework tailored for real-time UAV detection, tracking, and localization, emphasizing rapid response and coordinated sensor control. Unlike conventional single-sensor solutions, our architecture orchestrates multiple PTZ cameras via a sophisticated Visual Predictive Controller (VPC) that dynamically allocates resources, optimizes camera orientations, and fuses multiview data. By leveraging 3D triangulation strategies and strategic field-of-view allocation, the system ensures reliable coverage and vision-based tracking of fast-moving or evasive UAVs, even in dynamically changing scenes. Furthermore, in swarm scenarios, the framework addresses the complex challenge of assigning and coordinating PTZ cameras to track multiple UAVs simultaneously as they overlap or converge. Results from simulation experiments with various flight patterns and camera configurations demonstrated the performance and applicability of the proposed system to modern counter-UAS scenarios, highlighting its robustness in high-density aerial environments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".