Formal Model-Based Traceability for Security Compliance in Satellite Control Systems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ensuring robust security compliance and traceability is a critical challenge for Low-Earth Orbit (LEO) satellite control systems, given the complex landscape of evolving standards and regulatory requirements throughout their development lifecycle. This paper addresses the challenge of maintaining security compliance and traceability in LEO satellite control systems, which must adhere to multiple standards and regulations throughout the system development lifecycle. Existing work focuses on space system resilience but lacks comprehensive methods for compliance traceability. To fill this gap, we adopt a formal model-based systems engineering (MBSE) framework, previously applied for Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) systems, to support compliance checking for LEO satellite control systems. Using a domain-specific language, we model the software architecture with security controls and compliance requirements from standards like NIST SP 800-53 and CNSS Policy 12. The model is automatically translated into an Alloy formal model for automated compliance analysis. The results show that the framework not only enhances compliance traceability but also effectively identifies discrepancies and recommends appropriate controls. The reusable nature of the framework offers broader applications in aviation and critical infrastructure, streamlining assurance and audit processes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it