MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Blood Cell Detection: A Review

2025· article· W4416923882 on OpenAlexaff
Wen He, Tong Zhang, Tuoyu Ju, Yujuan Chen, Mengnan Liu, Le Zhao, Can Cheng

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicDigital Imaging for Blood Diseases
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlood cellFlow cytometryDiseaseCellPrecision medicineDisease monitoring

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Blood cell detection is vital for diagnosing diseases like anemia and leukemia, monitoring health, and supporting research. Once reliant on manual microscopy, it now employs automated methods for greater accuracy and efficiency. This review covers flow cytometry for rapid cell analysis, image analysis using machine learning for automated classification, and emerging technologies like microfluidics and biosensors. These advancements aid disease diagnosis, drug development, and health monitoring. Artificial intelligence integration promises enhanced precision and point-of-care testing, paving the way for personalized healthcare. These innovations collectively improve diagnostic capabilities and patient care.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.885
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDigital Imaging for Blood DiseasesFrench-language works237,207