MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416925694 · doi:10.1021/acs.macromol.5c02850

Entropy-Guided Reverse Deconvolution of Polyolefin MWDs into Flory Most Probable Distributions

2025· article· en· W4416925694 on OpenAlexaff
João B. P. Soares

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecules · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMachine Learning in Materials Science
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolyolefinDeconvolutionPolymerEntropy (arrow of time)Molar mass distribution

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multiple-site-type (MST) catalysts, such as heterogeneous Ziegler–Natta, Phillips, and some supported metallocenes, make polyolefins with broad molecular weight distributions (MWDs) that cannot be described with a single fundamental equation. Since polyolefin properties depend on their MWDs, accurate mathematical models for these distributions are essential in polymer reaction engineering. A popular modeling approach is to deconvolute their MWDs into several Flory most probable distributions (MPD). All previous deconvolution algorithms start by fitting an experimental MWD with a few Flory MPDs and then increase their number until the deviation between measured and predicted MWDs stops decreasing (forward deconvolution). This article reverses this approach, initially fitting experimental MWDs with multiple Flory MPDs and then decreasing their number with the assistance of a penalty function based on Shannon entropy (reverse deconvolution). The reverse method is easier to implement than the traditional forward methods and simplifies the automation of MWD deconvolution methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.760

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacromoleculesSame topicMachine Learning in Materials ScienceFrench-language works237,207