PDRs4All
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Context . The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), with its high spatial resolution and sensitivity, enabled the first detection of several v = 1–0 rovibrational emission lines of hydrogen deuteride HD in the Orion Bar, a prototypical photodissociation region (PDR). This provides an incentive to examine the physics of HD in dense and strongly irradiated PDRs. Aims . Using the latest data available on HD excitation by collisional, radiative, and chemical processes, our goal is to unveil HD formation and excitation processes in PDRs by comparing our state-of-the-art PDR model with observations made in the Orion Bar and discuss if and how HD can be used as a complementary tracer of physical parameters (thermal pressure and intensity of the UV field) in the emitting region. Methods . We computed detailed PDR models using an upgraded version of the Meudon PDR code (including radiative, collisional, and formation pumping excitation of HD rovibrational levels). Model results were then compared to spectro-imaging data acquired with the NIRSpec instrument on board JWST using population–excitation diagrams and synthetic emission spectra. Results . The models predict that HD is mainly produced in the gas phase via the reaction D + H 2 → H + HD at the front edge of the PDR, contrary to H 2 (which forms on grain surfaces), and that the D/HD transition is located slightly closer to the edge than the H/H 2 transition. Rovibrational levels are excited by UV pumping. In the observations, HD rovibrational emission is detected close to the H/H 2 dissociation fronts of the Orion Bar, and it peaks where vibrationally excited H 2 peaks, rather than at the maximum emission of pure rotational H 2 levels. We detected lines emitted from five different levels of HD ( v = 1) from which we can derive an excitation temperature around T ex ~ 480–710 K. Our comparison to PDR models showed that a range of thermal pressure P = (3–9) × 10 7 K cm −3 with no strong constraints on the intensity of the UV field G 0 are compatible with HD observations. This range of pressure is consistent with previous estimates from H 2 observations with JWST. Conclusions . This study provides a new detailed analysis of HD formation and excitation in PDRs. State-of-the-art PDR models with parameters best reproducing other tracers’ emission are compatible with HD observations, highlighting the coherence of the different studies. This is also the first time that observations of HD emission lines in the near-infrared have been used to put constraints on the thermal pressure in the PDR, even though the lines are very faint.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.494 | 0.378 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".