MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4416926517 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202557445

PDRs4All

2025· article· en· W4416926517 on OpenAlexafffund
Marion Zannese, J. Le Bourlot, Evelyne Roueff, Émeric Bron, Franck Le Petit, Dries Van De Putte, Maryvonne Gérin, Naslim Neelamkodan, Ryan Chown, Ameek Sidhu, E. Habart, E. Peeters, Olivier Berné

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueEuropean Social FundCentre National d’Etudes SpatialesCanadian Space AgencySpace Telescope Science InstituteAgencia Estatal de InvestigaciónNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsRotational–vibrational spectroscopyExcitationExcited stateTelescopeBar (unit)Line (geometry)UltravioletPhotodissociation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Context . The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), with its high spatial resolution and sensitivity, enabled the first detection of several v = 1–0 rovibrational emission lines of hydrogen deuteride HD in the Orion Bar, a prototypical photodissociation region (PDR). This provides an incentive to examine the physics of HD in dense and strongly irradiated PDRs. Aims . Using the latest data available on HD excitation by collisional, radiative, and chemical processes, our goal is to unveil HD formation and excitation processes in PDRs by comparing our state-of-the-art PDR model with observations made in the Orion Bar and discuss if and how HD can be used as a complementary tracer of physical parameters (thermal pressure and intensity of the UV field) in the emitting region. Methods . We computed detailed PDR models using an upgraded version of the Meudon PDR code (including radiative, collisional, and formation pumping excitation of HD rovibrational levels). Model results were then compared to spectro-imaging data acquired with the NIRSpec instrument on board JWST using population–excitation diagrams and synthetic emission spectra. Results . The models predict that HD is mainly produced in the gas phase via the reaction D + H 2 → H + HD at the front edge of the PDR, contrary to H 2 (which forms on grain surfaces), and that the D/HD transition is located slightly closer to the edge than the H/H 2 transition. Rovibrational levels are excited by UV pumping. In the observations, HD rovibrational emission is detected close to the H/H 2 dissociation fronts of the Orion Bar, and it peaks where vibrationally excited H 2 peaks, rather than at the maximum emission of pure rotational H 2 levels. We detected lines emitted from five different levels of HD ( v = 1) from which we can derive an excitation temperature around T ex ~ 480–710 K. Our comparison to PDR models showed that a range of thermal pressure P = (3–9) × 10 7 K cm −3 with no strong constraints on the intensity of the UV field G 0 are compatible with HD observations. This range of pressure is consistent with previous estimates from H 2 observations with JWST. Conclusions . This study provides a new detailed analysis of HD formation and excitation in PDRs. State-of-the-art PDR models with parameters best reproducing other tracers’ emission are compatible with HD observations, highlighting the coherence of the different studies. This is also the first time that observations of HD emission lines in the near-infrared have been used to put constraints on the thermal pressure in the PDR, even though the lines are very faint.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.494
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4940.378

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and Astrophysics→Same topicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies→French-language works237,207→