Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This essay offers an in-depth exploration of audio erotica, specifically from the Quinn app, and its potential to shape new understandings and imaginations of feminist sex. The essay identifies three key elements that define the soundscape of feminist audio erotica: 1) its naturalistic modality (van Leeuwen 1999), which allows listeners to witness and engage with feminist sex; 2) the “grain of the voice” (Barthes 1977), which highlights the sensuality of consent-driven, communicative intimacy; and 3) a gendered reversal of visual and auditory frenzy which subverts our patriarchal sexual imagination that women’s sexuality is audible, while men’s is visual (Corbett and Kapsalis 1996). In mapping this soundscape the essay muses on the possibilities offered to listeners by attuning themselves to sexuality rooted in “pleasure, safety and [calmness]” (Larson 2019).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it