Pengaruh Penggunaan Teknologi dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia terhadap Kemampuan Menulis Pada Siswa Kelas III SDI Betun Kota
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aims to determine the effect of technology use in Indonesian language learning on students' writing skills. The research method used was descriptive quantitative. This study was conducted at SDI Betun Kota, Wehali Village, Malaka Tengah District, Malaka Regency. The data collection technique used was a test, and the analysis technique used was a statistical t-test. The results showed that 18 students, or 44.44%, obtained high scores in writing skills, while 16.67% scored low in learning outcomes. This is evidenced by the results of the significance test, namely t-test of 14.52, which is greater than t-table at the 5% significance level. N = 18 (2.14), or equal to t-test > t-table, or 16.67 > 2.14. Based on the research results above, t-test is greater than t-table, with t-test = 16.67 and t-table = 2.14. Therefore, Ho is rejected and Ha is accepted. Thus, it can be concluded that technology use influences students' writing skills in Indonesian language learning in grade III of SDI Betun Kota.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it