Analisis Dampak Penggunaan Media Pembelajaran terhadap Karakter Profil Pelajar Pancasila Kepada Siswa Kelas V SDK Manumuti
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the impact of using learning media on the character development of Pancasila students in grade V of Manumuti Elementary School. This study used a qualitative approach with a case study. Data collection was conducted through observations that measured students' perceptions of the learning media and based on Pancasila student profile indicators. The qualitative approach allows researchers to gain a deeper understanding of the phenomenon being studied by examining in detail different cases within the problem being studied. Information was collected directly from the field through verbal expressions and observation of actions. The results of the study indicate that the implementation of learning media in grade V of Manumuti Elementary School varied and presented. Meanwhile, the character profile of Pancasila students in grade V showed positive development in the dimensions of mutual cooperation, independence, faith, devotion to God Almighty, and noble character. This study concludes that the use of planned and relevant learning media is an effective strategy in strengthening the character profile of Pancasila students.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".