MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Data-Driven Corrective and Preventive Action (CAPA) Systems for Quality Assurance Optimization

2025· article· W4416943557 on OpenAlexaff
Ademola Joseph Adeyemo

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research and Studies · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFood Supply Chain Traceability
Canadian institutionsResearch Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuality assuranceAnalyticsQuality (philosophy)AuditProcess (computing)Identification (biology)Root cause analysisDocumentationQuality management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Data-driven Corrective and Preventive Action (CAPA) systems are emerging as transformative tools for optimizing quality assurance and ensuring sustained food safety performance. This study investigates how digital CAPA frameworks leveraging predictive analytics, machine learning, and real-time data visualization can significantly reduce non-conformances, strengthen process efficiency, and reinforce continuous improvement in food manufacturing operations. Traditional CAPA systems, though essential for compliance, often rely on reactive measures that identify deviations post-occurrence, leading to delays, inefficiencies, and repetitive quality lapses. By contrast, data-driven CAPA models integrate advanced analytics with digital quality management platforms to enable proactive identification of potential risks, root cause analysis, and timely corrective actions before deviations escalate into regulatory non-compliance. The research explores the fusion of Internet of Things (IoT) sensors, enterprise data systems, and predictive algorithms that enable automatic capture, analysis, and correlation of quality events across production lines. Through trend recognition and anomaly detection, digital CAPA models provide actionable insights that facilitate continuous process optimization. These systems enhance traceability, promote evidence-based decision-making, and foster a culture of quality ownership throughout the organization. Moreover, the integration of predictive analytics supports early warning mechanisms that detect deviations in hygiene, temperature, and contamination thresholds key determinants of food safety. This study also examines the alignment of data-driven CAPA systems with Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) principles and ISO 22000 requirements, demonstrating how harmonized frameworks improve audit readiness, documentation integrity, and regulatory compliance. Implementation case analyses reveal measurable reductions in recurrence of non-conformances, cycle times for corrective actions, and costs associated with product recalls and waste. Ultimately, the adoption of digital CAPA supported by predictive analytics enhances organizational agility, reduces operational risk, and accelerates the path toward a zero-defect culture in food manufacturing. By embedding intelligence, transparency, and traceability into quality management systems, data-driven CAPA models represent a critical evolution in modern food safety governance. The findings underscore their potential as a strategic enabler for continuous improvement, operational excellence, and regulatory resilience within global food supply chains.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.422
Threshold uncertainty score0.605

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.229
GPT teacher head0.501
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research and StudiesSame topicFood Supply Chain TraceabilityFrench-language works237,207