Quantum Simulation of Ligand-like Molecules through Sample-based Quantum Diagonalization in Density Matrix Embedding Framework
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The accurate treatment of electron correlation in extended molecular systems remains computationally challenging using classical electronic structure methods. Hybrid quantum-classical algorithms offer a potential route to overcome these limitations; however, their practical deployment on existing quantum computers requires strategies that both reduce problem size and mitigate hardware noise. In this work, we investigate ground-state energy calculations of ligand-like molecules using Sample-based Quantum Diagonalization (SQD) within the Density Matrix Embedding Theory (DMET) framework, focusing on low-symmetry systems with diverse bonding motifs that exhibit subsystem-dependent variations in fragment-environment entanglement. These entanglement-based variations directly influence bath orbital construction, impurity sizes, and the structure of the embedded Hamiltonians, posing nontrivial challenges for both embedding and quantum sampling. By combining DMET fragmentation with SQD-based construction of reduced configuration spaces through quantum sampling and iterative configuration recovery, we perform quantum simulations on IBM's Eagle R3 (IBM Sherbrooke) and IBM's Heron R3 (IBM Boston) superconducting quantum hardware thereby, showing that the entanglement structure across embedding subsystems plays a central role in determining the efficiency and accuracy of the simulations. Despite these complexities, we show that the DMET-SQD framework yields ground-state energies in strong agreement with DMET-FCI benchmarks, achieving chemical accuracy (1 kcal/mol) across all systems studied. These results demonstrate that SQD-based quantum simulations can be robustly extended to low-symmetry, chemically realistic, industry relevant molecules, and highlight the importance of entanglement-aware embedding strategies for scalable quantum electronic structure calculations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".